Tuesday, February 21, 2017

'Quake-Weather 22th February 2017': A Global Earthquake Review



In this and similar reports we will be examining the global "earthquake weather", and we will be reporting where on the world our technique shows higher probability of siesmic vulnerability. Although we can do this for each and every one country by now, due to time contraints, the nature of the research, (we will be testing variant ideas), we will be listing out a few across the world. We hope this is useful to you, and certainly it will help us improve our techniques.

Using our methods we can deduce that for 22nd February 2017, the following quakeweather and the following regions appear to be vulnerable to siesmic activity. Our experience shows that the time event tolerance can be +-1 day, and therefore it is worth keeping the list for 2 days as an event in the list could sometimes materialise the next day and sometimes the late hours of the previous day.

GLOBAL QUAKEWEATHER OVERVIEW: 
February 22nd is a day where we expect to fair earthquake activity, similar to 21st February but probably less severe. I expct slightly less activity. After all we have had a 6.5R event in 21st February, and we dont get them every day. Notable Geocentric Aspects are Mars Square Pluto and Venus semisextile Neptune.
The following are some coordinates we produced using our methods.

AMERICAS:
  • Mexico  (10N, 78.2W), (18N, 103W)
  • Chile (18.6S, 70.4W)
  • Peru  (10.5S, 78.4W)
  • Ecuador (4S, 79W)
  • British Columbia (48.5N, 123W)
  • Kamchatka (47.5N, 154E)

EUROPE: Quiet really, we could see more activity perhaps in Greece 
  • Greece (35N,  23E), (40N, 21E)

ASIA/AUSTRALIA:   The possible countries which could come up are shown below.
  • Fiji (18.5S, 176.5E)
  • Pakistan (29.5N, 68.2E, 70.4E)
  • Solomon Islands (9.4S, 159.4E)
  • Philippines (10.5N, 124.4E)
  • Tonga (21S, 173W)



You may also like:

2 comments :

  1. Why no daily updates on this website?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sometimes we get ill, unwell, rundown, Murphy's law.??

    ReplyDelete